The author of Common Sense Atheism, Luke Muehlhauser, began a counter-apologetics project called ‘Why Christianity is False.’ This project’s goal was to specifically respond to each essay in the series ‘Why Christianity is True,’ hosted by Brian Auten of Apologetics 315.
Unfortunately for those of us who enjoyed this series by Luke, he decided to pursue other projects. I wanted to see this series completed, so I suggested that a group of atheist bloggers could tackle this series of essays, lessening the burden on any one blogger. Foxhole Atheism will be teaming up with two other blogs to accomplish this: Soul Sprawl and Answers in Genesis Busted.
This page will serve as an index to the series on my own site that I will update as the response essays are completed. Comments are welcome. Enjoy!
Completed:
- Four Bad Arguments for God + round 2 (reply to Tawa Anderson)
- ‘God Did It’ is a Terrible Explanation + round 2 (reply to Jim Wallace)
- Christianity is Incoherent + round 2 (reply to Wes Widner)
- Reply to ‘The Failure of Naturalism’ (reply to Richard Gerhardt)
- Explaining Logic (reply to Glenn Hendrickson)
- Bad Apologetics (reply to Brian Colón)
- How Warranted is Properly Basic Belief? (reply to Matthew Flannagan)
- Reply to ‘Defrocking the Priests of Scientism’ (reply to Bob Perry)
- The Gospels Tell You…So What? (reply to Vocab Malone & Paul D. Adams)
Forthcoming:
- (reply to Peter Grice)
- (reply to Chad Gross)
- (reply to Shelby Cade)
- (reply to Luke Nix)
- (reply to Aaron Brake)
- (reply to Amy Hall)
- (reply to James Patrick Holding)
- (reply to Stephen J. Bedard)
- (reply to Anthony Horvath)
- (reply to Mariano Grinbank)
- (reply to Marcus McElhaney)
- (reply to Kyle Deming)
- (reply to Brian Auten)
6 comments
3 pings
Randy Everist
October 1, 2011 at 4:10 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I know several of these guys, and let me tell you: Matt Flannagan is brilliant.
Mike
October 1, 2011 at 4:20 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I enjoyed his fallacy podcast. I haven’t spent much time on his website, though. I think Matt of Soul Sprawl is responding to that one.
Matt DeStefano
October 2, 2011 at 5:47 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Yeah, I’ve interacted with Flannagan before. He’s a nice guy and certainly intelligent. However, this article is defending Reformed Epistemology, and I think even a majority of theists are a little embarrassed at fideist approaches to knowledge.
I think he’s certainly the best thinker that I drew in my selections.
Nicholas Covington
October 23, 2011 at 12:48 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Hi Luke,
My response is to Richard Gerhardt, not Bob Perry. Thanks for the link!
Ryan
Mike
October 24, 2011 at 3:44 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Fixed it. Thanks. Is there a free version of that piece available?
Nicholas Covington
January 22, 2012 at 8:04 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Hi,
I’ve posted a response to Vocab Malone & Paul D. Adams here:
http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2012/01/gospels-tell-you-so-what.html
Explaining Logic | Foxhole Atheism
September 30, 2011 at 6:16 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
[...] « Why Christianity is False (Index) [...]
Explaining Logic (Foxhole Atheism)
October 2, 2011 at 7:33 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
[...] [This post is part of the series Why Christianity is False] [...]
How Warranted is Properly Basic Belief? | Foxhole Atheism
October 3, 2011 at 3:51 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
[...] is a guest post by Matt DeStefano, and is part of the continued series Why Christianity is False. You can read more of Matt’s work at Soul Sprawl. In order to keep discussion under one [...]